The New York Times and other liberal news organizations have been spending a lot of time discussing the issues relating to a deal with Iran to end the hostilities. It’s so misleading to say that the US and Iran have been negotiating a treaty that will bring peace to the Middle East. The US controls the situation completely. And to say that Iran has any leverage at the bargaining table is frankly laughable. The meetings between the US and Iran are mostly to discuss conditions Iran will have to accept.

Let’s first consider the current state of Iran from military, economic and diplomatic points of view. Iran’s military has been destroyed. Its army is in shambles. Iranian foot soldiers appear to have no power of persuasion over the government. And the government has very few influential religious leaders and politicians who understand the gravity of the situation and/or are qualified to conduct high level diplomatic negotiations.

Second, Iran cannot muster a large group of willing soldiers to counter-attack the US. Iran’s ground forces are mostly rockets with dubious effectiveness. In fact, most missiles launched at Israel and Lebanon were shot down with anti-missiles.

Iran will have to turn over its remaining nuclear material to the US or Trump is going to attack infrastructure targets with air power. There is absolutely no way Iran will have the ability or the money to rebuild a nuclear arsenal.

The Times is trying to give credibility to Iran’s fighting forces. It’s a total distortion. Before long, the US is going to finish off any remnants of military capability. Iran will have to sign whatever the US puts in front of its negotiators.

President Trump stood up to Iran about six weeks ago. The US defeated the rogue country in a very short period of time.  

Hezbollah was tormenting Israel with missile strikes from Lebanon. Israel’s Netanyahu was screaming for the US to respond to actions by Hezbollah and by Iran’s other proxies. It was time to take the next step in the Iran saga- 50 years of bad behavior and loss of lives in the thousands.

Trump called for the complete destruction of Iran’s nuclear weapons production. This has been accomplished with a miniscule number of US casualties and little damage to US armaments. The battle plan was a complete success.

In spite of his success on the battle front, the liberal press has not commented positively about Trump’s accomplishments. The US military leaders have estimated that US forces have destroyed 75% of Iran’s critical assets. Whether Trump decides to destroy the remaining assets of Iran, primarily infrastructure, will depend upon Iran’s leadership accepting the US terms of Iran surrender.

All of the important considerations relating to going to war have been under advisement. Safety of the US military, effectiveness of US military assets and eliminating collateral damage have all been carefully thought through by US generals.

And yet, all we hear about is utter nonsense from the left. The war only lasted six weeks and the most dangerous murders since WWII have been killed. And the Middle East no longer needs to be concerned about crazy ayatollahs using nuclear weapons to intimidate others.

But now I want to ask the most important question relating to Iran. Would any US citizen choose to go back in time? Iran would be what it was just several weeks ago. That means that Iran would be on the verge of building nuclear bombs, Iran proxies would be tormenting the Middle East and the US would be threatening Iran.

You must consider that Iran has been neutered. It has no military and the odds of a nuclear war are slim to none. Would you really want the crazy ayatollahs near the buttons to launch nuclear weapons at Isael and at US troops in the region? I think we should be thankful that the risks of a nuclear war are zero.